<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It came from behind the sun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/</link>
	<description>In which news, politics and religion are mixed - a potentially volatile combination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:59:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERIC</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-4109</link>
		<dc:creator>ERIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-4109</guid>
		<description>I am immensely enjoying your information on the ten tribes.  I also run an identical themed blog (alot less mature in its content) and say emphatically that you are spot on in what you are laying out here on the ten tribes.  You are the first person that thinks identically and completely in harmony with my line of thinking (and with that of the early brethren).  You prepared for your mission just as I did and received remarkable personal revelation that has laid the foundation for your faith and further personal growth.  Because you have done the hard things to achieve this state of thinking, you will be one of the few that is able to see things as they are when the hard things happen that will come to pass shortly.  It truly will a be a great and a dreadful day when the Lord appears.
As catastrophists, you and I both know the awesome things that will transpire as the &quot;everlasting hills tremble&quot; in the events leading up to the grand finale.

You probably have blogged it already (and I just have not come across it), but we are about to enter a civil war in this country that will shake it from coast to coast.  Read my blog to see the supporting research on that.  I am one of the few people that sees it coming.  Like the ten tribes adherents (who are few and far between), there are few who recognize the Book of Mormon as the manual that it is for dealing with the extreme difficulties of war in your own land.  There is dualism in Section 87 as I always say.

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am immensely enjoying your information on the ten tribes.  I also run an identical themed blog (alot less mature in its content) and say emphatically that you are spot on in what you are laying out here on the ten tribes.  You are the first person that thinks identically and completely in harmony with my line of thinking (and with that of the early brethren).  You prepared for your mission just as I did and received remarkable personal revelation that has laid the foundation for your faith and further personal growth.  Because you have done the hard things to achieve this state of thinking, you will be one of the few that is able to see things as they are when the hard things happen that will come to pass shortly.  It truly will a be a great and a dreadful day when the Lord appears.<br />
As catastrophists, you and I both know the awesome things that will transpire as the &#8220;everlasting hills tremble&#8221; in the events leading up to the grand finale.</p>
<p>You probably have blogged it already (and I just have not come across it), but we are about to enter a civil war in this country that will shake it from coast to coast.  Read my blog to see the supporting research on that.  I am one of the few people that sees it coming.  Like the ten tribes adherents (who are few and far between), there are few who recognize the Book of Mormon as the manual that it is for dealing with the extreme difficulties of war in your own land.  There is dualism in Section 87 as I always say.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sibes</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>sibes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 05:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>I think we need to be wary about developing theories based on our own conjectures or on comments from other members of the church.

That said, we know that the entire City of Enoch was translated and will return during the Second Coming. The scriptures say that Zion from above will be reunited with Zion from beneath. Personally, I think that this homecoming will be a simple process that is less impressive than the joy the saints experience.

Apparently, King Melkizedek and the City of Salem were likewise translated. The scriptures that we currently have do not give us enough information on this, but it would be great to find out more.

When the righteous of this time are reunited with the righteous of ages past, it will be a glorious day indeed. I hope many of us are present to see the promises of the Lord fulfilled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to be wary about developing theories based on our own conjectures or on comments from other members of the church.</p>
<p>That said, we know that the entire City of Enoch was translated and will return during the Second Coming. The scriptures say that Zion from above will be reunited with Zion from beneath. Personally, I think that this homecoming will be a simple process that is less impressive than the joy the saints experience.</p>
<p>Apparently, King Melkizedek and the City of Salem were likewise translated. The scriptures that we currently have do not give us enough information on this, but it would be great to find out more.</p>
<p>When the righteous of this time are reunited with the righteous of ages past, it will be a glorious day indeed. I hope many of us are present to see the promises of the Lord fulfilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitterpated</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3534</link>
		<dc:creator>twitterpated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3534</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very interested in the reality of translated individuals. We know from scripture that those who repented at the time of Noah, for example, were caught up to be with the Lord, so these incidents are not confined to the time of Enoch.

Besides John the Beloved and the three Nephites, there were other obedient Christians who were translated. I think it&#039;s safe to assume Moses and his brother Aaron were translated, as well as Elijah. Also, the brothers Nephi and Lehi appear to have been translated. Whether there were more individuals or peoples translated we do not know as yet.

At one time, we were all angels and dwelt in heaven together. It is logical to assume that heaven it is a series of planets on a higher order, the divine order. It&#039;s not far-fetched to think of going to heaven without experiencing mortal death. From the scriptures, it seems evident that many of the righteous of this generation will be caught up to be with the Lord before the destruction of the wicked occurs.

It&#039;s probably safe to assume that all the saints whose missions were on this earth will be reunited at some time in the near future, probably at the Second Coming before the Millennial reign, and that we will no longer dwell exclusively here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very interested in the reality of translated individuals. We know from scripture that those who repented at the time of Noah, for example, were caught up to be with the Lord, so these incidents are not confined to the time of Enoch.</p>
<p>Besides John the Beloved and the three Nephites, there were other obedient Christians who were translated. I think it&#8217;s safe to assume Moses and his brother Aaron were translated, as well as Elijah. Also, the brothers Nephi and Lehi appear to have been translated. Whether there were more individuals or peoples translated we do not know as yet.</p>
<p>At one time, we were all angels and dwelt in heaven together. It is logical to assume that heaven it is a series of planets on a higher order, the divine order. It&#8217;s not far-fetched to think of going to heaven without experiencing mortal death. From the scriptures, it seems evident that many of the righteous of this generation will be caught up to be with the Lord before the destruction of the wicked occurs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably safe to assume that all the saints whose missions were on this earth will be reunited at some time in the near future, probably at the Second Coming before the Millennial reign, and that we will no longer dwell exclusively here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Faux</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Faux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>Tim:

You and I agree on about 97% of everything, and so I am NOT too inclined to hassle you about the 3% we differ on.  True, I absolutely love traditional scientific interpretations of earth origins, etc., but you and I BOTH know that the gospel comes FIRST.  

Besides, you are one of a tiny handful of individuals on the Bloggernacle who could cause me to actually shut up, pause, and wonder if I might be wrong.  I mean that as a very high compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim:</p>
<p>You and I agree on about 97% of everything, and so I am NOT too inclined to hassle you about the 3% we differ on.  True, I absolutely love traditional scientific interpretations of earth origins, etc., but you and I BOTH know that the gospel comes FIRST.  </p>
<p>Besides, you are one of a tiny handful of individuals on the Bloggernacle who could cause me to actually shut up, pause, and wonder if I might be wrong.  I mean that as a very high compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Malone</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>Amen, Russ, Amen!  Good advice.  Thanks so much for returning and sharing additional thoughts.  I&#039;m with you that we do not want to becomes obsessive about and allow unrevealed mysteries to detract from the key doctrines of the gospel or consume us.

As I shared with my good friend and fellow blogger S. Faux above, this subject is pure speculation and not at all central to our salvation.  And of course, you are right about Eliza R. Snow.  Brigham Young called her a prophetess, but she was not our prophet.

I believe that what Eliza shared in her poems was considered common knowledge back in the early days of the church.  This is evidenced by the quote from an early and well-respected apostle Orson Pratt in my essay.  His brother Parley also taught the doctrine.

Time has changed the way we view in the church this question of where the lost ten tribes are located.  If it was common knowledge in the 1840&#039;s, by 1910 less than 30% of the members of the church believed that they are not here among us on the earth.

Again, as I noted in my comment to S. Faux, from my experience in discussing this concept with members of the church in my neck of the woods, less than 5% believe it today.  The majority believe as you do that the lost tribes are dispersed among us.

I think I have made it clear over the years through my essays here on Latter-day Commentary, I believe that the lost ten tribes of Israel are in a separate body and will join us at some future day.  They will return just as the City of Enoch will return.

The phrase &quot;land of the North&quot; is one that engenders much speculation.  I do not believe that it refers to anyplace on this earth, but to a portion of the earth that used to be attached and to which the lost ten tribes ascended through miraculous means.

Yes, it is dangerous to believe in and act upon false ideas and false doctrine, especially when it comes to our salvation.  Like you, I too will continue to study and follow the gospel of Jesus Christ and not waste too much time in speculative scripture reading.

My ideas about the giant chunk of earth landing at the pole have been refined over the years.  I don&#039;t believe there will be physical contact when it comes back and I don&#039;t believe that it will reintegrate or reassemble in any way.  It was always a separate body.

I agree that we just do not know details of the lost ten tribes.  I suspect that we are both right.  Some from the ten tribes are indeed among us.  Yet, there may be a large body of them somewhere separate.  We know that they have prophets among them.

We also know that the Savior visited them after his visit to the Nephites in ancient America.  And we know that when they return, they will bring their records with them.  These records will include their dealings with the Savior and with John the Revelator.

Thank you again for your additional comments and for your caution.  I am honored that you took the time to share your thoughts on the subject.  I recognize that I am a bit of a maverick on this idea, but I assure you that I do not teach this in official settings.

As a long time teacher in the church, I follow Elder Packer&#039;s direction about what I teach from the pulpit or in the classroom.  I only teach that which is found in the authorized and current manuals of the church.  I leave the speculation for my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Russ, Amen!  Good advice.  Thanks so much for returning and sharing additional thoughts.  I&#8217;m with you that we do not want to becomes obsessive about and allow unrevealed mysteries to detract from the key doctrines of the gospel or consume us.</p>
<p>As I shared with my good friend and fellow blogger S. Faux above, this subject is pure speculation and not at all central to our salvation.  And of course, you are right about Eliza R. Snow.  Brigham Young called her a prophetess, but she was not our prophet.</p>
<p>I believe that what Eliza shared in her poems was considered common knowledge back in the early days of the church.  This is evidenced by the quote from an early and well-respected apostle Orson Pratt in my essay.  His brother Parley also taught the doctrine.</p>
<p>Time has changed the way we view in the church this question of where the lost ten tribes are located.  If it was common knowledge in the 1840&#8242;s, by 1910 less than 30% of the members of the church believed that they are not here among us on the earth.</p>
<p>Again, as I noted in my comment to S. Faux, from my experience in discussing this concept with members of the church in my neck of the woods, less than 5% believe it today.  The majority believe as you do that the lost tribes are dispersed among us.</p>
<p>I think I have made it clear over the years through my essays here on Latter-day Commentary, I believe that the lost ten tribes of Israel are in a separate body and will join us at some future day.  They will return just as the City of Enoch will return.</p>
<p>The phrase &#8220;land of the North&#8221; is one that engenders much speculation.  I do not believe that it refers to anyplace on this earth, but to a portion of the earth that used to be attached and to which the lost ten tribes ascended through miraculous means.</p>
<p>Yes, it is dangerous to believe in and act upon false ideas and false doctrine, especially when it comes to our salvation.  Like you, I too will continue to study and follow the gospel of Jesus Christ and not waste too much time in speculative scripture reading.</p>
<p>My ideas about the giant chunk of earth landing at the pole have been refined over the years.  I don&#8217;t believe there will be physical contact when it comes back and I don&#8217;t believe that it will reintegrate or reassemble in any way.  It was always a separate body.</p>
<p>I agree that we just do not know details of the lost ten tribes.  I suspect that we are both right.  Some from the ten tribes are indeed among us.  Yet, there may be a large body of them somewhere separate.  We know that they have prophets among them.</p>
<p>We also know that the Savior visited them after his visit to the Nephites in ancient America.  And we know that when they return, they will bring their records with them.  These records will include their dealings with the Savior and with John the Revelator.</p>
<p>Thank you again for your additional comments and for your caution.  I am honored that you took the time to share your thoughts on the subject.  I recognize that I am a bit of a maverick on this idea, but I assure you that I do not teach this in official settings.</p>
<p>As a long time teacher in the church, I follow Elder Packer&#8217;s direction about what I teach from the pulpit or in the classroom.  I only teach that which is found in the authorized and current manuals of the church.  I leave the speculation for my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>It is very possible that the people of Enoch are on some other planet somewhere, but it seems rather clear that the Ten Tribes are located among the people of the earth and not in some group separate. Ephraim and Manasseh are among the ten missing tribes and they both are now in large number among the latter-day saints. The (restoration) of the ten lost tribes has been underway for some time. Yes, Eliza R. Snow was a plural wife of Joseph Smith, but that does not give her special knowledge that the rest of the saints did not have. Just as I would not follow the counsel of the Stake President&#039;s wife in spiritual and temporal affairs instead of the him. I will listen to the actual writings of Joseph Smith or the later prophets. I know that every man has opinions as well including the Prophet, but unless something is in the scriptures or official doctrine it would be an error to follow it. Until there is an official explanation of D&amp;C 133 I will leave it as a mystery. Besides, I have always looked at verse 26 as a symbolic representation of the last days. 

I think what this discussion comes down to in the end is that we just do not know and we will have to wait for &#039;further light and knowledge&#039; to be revealed at some future date. As long as we do not become obsessive on points of mystery and allow it to distract us from the key doctrines of the gospel then I guess these suppositions are relatively harmless. We just should be cautious not to read more into the scriptures than has been revealed. We do not want to make the same mistake that the Jews made and reach beyond the mark. I will admit it would be kind of cool to have a giant chunk of earth land at the pole though. How cool it would be to witness such a miracle? But, I will continue to follow the gospel and not waste to much time in speculative scripture reading. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very possible that the people of Enoch are on some other planet somewhere, but it seems rather clear that the Ten Tribes are located among the people of the earth and not in some group separate. Ephraim and Manasseh are among the ten missing tribes and they both are now in large number among the latter-day saints. The (restoration) of the ten lost tribes has been underway for some time. Yes, Eliza R. Snow was a plural wife of Joseph Smith, but that does not give her special knowledge that the rest of the saints did not have. Just as I would not follow the counsel of the Stake President&#8217;s wife in spiritual and temporal affairs instead of the him. I will listen to the actual writings of Joseph Smith or the later prophets. I know that every man has opinions as well including the Prophet, but unless something is in the scriptures or official doctrine it would be an error to follow it. Until there is an official explanation of D&amp;C 133 I will leave it as a mystery. Besides, I have always looked at verse 26 as a symbolic representation of the last days. </p>
<p>I think what this discussion comes down to in the end is that we just do not know and we will have to wait for &#8216;further light and knowledge&#8217; to be revealed at some future date. As long as we do not become obsessive on points of mystery and allow it to distract us from the key doctrines of the gospel then I guess these suppositions are relatively harmless. We just should be cautious not to read more into the scriptures than has been revealed. We do not want to make the same mistake that the Jews made and reach beyond the mark. I will admit it would be kind of cool to have a giant chunk of earth land at the pole though. How cool it would be to witness such a miracle? But, I will continue to follow the gospel and not waste to much time in speculative scripture reading. <img src='http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Malone</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>Hi Russ.  Thanks for stopping by.  Yes the quote is hearsay.  Wandle Mace heard Joseph Smith say it. :-)  He recorded it in his autobiography, which is found in the Harold B. Lee Library at BYU and can be read online at the quote I provided in the essay.  Here is that link again in case you missed it.  Search for &quot;Ten Tribes&quot; once you are in the document.

&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.boap.org/LDS/Early-Saints/WMace.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.boap.org/LDS/Early-Saints/WMace.html&lt;/A&gt;

Also read the poem from Eliza R. Snow, one of Joseph&#039;s wives that R. Gary referred to in the link in his comment above.  You can also find it in the Wandle Mace autobiography.  This doctrine was clearly believed and taught in the early days of the church and even in my youth.  Sadly, it is not commonly believed or taught today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russ.  Thanks for stopping by.  Yes the quote is hearsay.  Wandle Mace heard Joseph Smith say it. <img src='http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   He recorded it in his autobiography, which is found in the Harold B. Lee Library at BYU and can be read online at the quote I provided in the essay.  Here is that link again in case you missed it.  Search for &#8220;Ten Tribes&#8221; once you are in the document.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.boap.org/LDS/Early-Saints/WMace.html" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.boap.org/LDS/Early-Saints/WMace.html</a></p>
<p>Also read the poem from Eliza R. Snow, one of Joseph&#8217;s wives that R. Gary referred to in the link in his comment above.  You can also find it in the Wandle Mace autobiography.  This doctrine was clearly believed and taught in the early days of the church and even in my youth.  Sadly, it is not commonly believed or taught today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>Hate to say it but this quote is hearsay: 
&quot;Brother Mace (said) that Joseph was preaching on the subject of the restoration of all things. In the course of his remarks he spoke of the earth being divided at various times. He said, “When Enoch and his city was taken away, a portion of earth was taken and would again be restored.” He then said the same about the Ten Tribes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it but this quote is hearsay:<br />
&#8220;Brother Mace (said) that Joseph was preaching on the subject of the restoration of all things. In the course of his remarks he spoke of the earth being divided at various times. He said, “When Enoch and his city was taken away, a portion of earth was taken and would again be restored.” He then said the same about the Ten Tribes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Latter-day Commentary » Blog Archive » It came from behind the sun -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Latter-day Commentary » Blog Archive » It came from behind the sun -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by LDS Blogs, Tim Malone. Tim Malone said: Are the lost ten tribes off on some planet somewhere and do #LDS people believe this? It was once #Mormon doctrine: http://bit.ly/3vhtnT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by LDS Blogs, Tim Malone. Tim Malone said: Are the lost ten tribes off on some planet somewhere and do #LDS people believe this? It was once #Mormon doctrine: <a href="http://bit.ly/3vhtnT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3vhtnT</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Malone</title>
		<link>http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/index.php/it-came-from-behind-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaycommentary.com/blog/?p=520#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>S.Faux: You are not alone.  My ad hoc surveys show that about 95% of the church members feel the same way you do about the location of the lost ten tribes.  But let&#039;s remember a couple of things:  1) This is a fringe doctrine that is not central to our salvation and 2) Unless a living prophet comes right out and clearly teaches something about the subject, whatever we believe is pure speculation.

I learned this doctrine when I was but a lad, growing up in the old Covina Stake here in Southern California.  I remember some High Council speakers teaching on the subject and it intrigued me so I did some studying and digging.  You don&#039;t hear this idea taught much any more.  In fact, the handbook specifically advises us to avoid speculation and controversial subjects when we speak from the pulpit.

After several years of pondeirng and thinking about the creation of the earth, I&#039;ve decided to revisit the topic in my next essay.  I remember I got blasted when I first wrote about the ideas of evolution and the creation.  I want to focus on several quotes of the early brethren who said that Joseph taught that this world was organized from the fragments of other, much older worlds.

I think I&#039;ve written several times that I am a &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophism&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Catastrophist&lt;/A&gt;  and don&#039;t believe in &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformitarianism_(science)&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Uniformitarianism&lt;/A&gt;.  I imagine you have engaged in dozens of dialogs about this.  If fact, I&#039;ve read many of your comments about this on various spots in the Bloggernacle.  I hope you&#039;ll come back and comment on what I offer.  Knowing that you are an expert on the subject, I will greatly value your critiques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.Faux: You are not alone.  My ad hoc surveys show that about 95% of the church members feel the same way you do about the location of the lost ten tribes.  But let&#8217;s remember a couple of things:  1) This is a fringe doctrine that is not central to our salvation and 2) Unless a living prophet comes right out and clearly teaches something about the subject, whatever we believe is pure speculation.</p>
<p>I learned this doctrine when I was but a lad, growing up in the old Covina Stake here in Southern California.  I remember some High Council speakers teaching on the subject and it intrigued me so I did some studying and digging.  You don&#8217;t hear this idea taught much any more.  In fact, the handbook specifically advises us to avoid speculation and controversial subjects when we speak from the pulpit.</p>
<p>After several years of pondeirng and thinking about the creation of the earth, I&#8217;ve decided to revisit the topic in my next essay.  I remember I got blasted when I first wrote about the ideas of evolution and the creation.  I want to focus on several quotes of the early brethren who said that Joseph taught that this world was organized from the fragments of other, much older worlds.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve written several times that I am a <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophism" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Catastrophist</a>  and don&#8217;t believe in <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformitarianism_(science)" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Uniformitarianism</a>.  I imagine you have engaged in dozens of dialogs about this.  If fact, I&#8217;ve read many of your comments about this on various spots in the Bloggernacle.  I hope you&#8217;ll come back and comment on what I offer.  Knowing that you are an expert on the subject, I will greatly value your critiques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

